My Crossword Maker Logo
Powered by BrightSprout
Save Status:
or to save your progress. The page will not refresh.
Controls:
SPACEBAR SWITCHES TYPING DIRECTION
Answer Key:
Edit a Copy:
Make Your Own:
Crucigrama Sopa de Letras Hoja de Trabajo
Calificar este Puzzle:
Log in or sign up to rate this puzzle.

Philosophy Quiz

Horizontales
When faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.
An attitude or belief which is based on the person's experience so cannot be falsified.
Arguments where the conclusion is supported by the premises, but not entailed by them
Idea that objects are mind-independent
Existing outside of time
A deductive argument which has at least one false premise
All meaningful claims are either analytic or empirically verifiable
the idea that all learning comes from only experience and observations
No subject to change
Knowledge of theism that is acquired through experiences and contact with God.
Verticales
Knowledge of propositions that do not require sense experience to prove it true or false
A proposition which is true or false depending on how the world is
Descartes' circular theory- depending on clear and distinct ideas to discuss God and depending on God to discuss clear and distinct ideas.
Using knowledge of an individual concept and applying it on a large scale
Outside or beyond the universe
A deductive argument with true premises
We perceive physical objects indirectly through sense data
Knowledge of theism that is acquired through sacred texts
The ability to refute a statement by claiming it can be false
A proposition which is always true or false regardless of how the world is
There can be a priori synthetic knowledge of the world, and it is innate
The idea that our senses provide us with direct awareness of objects as they really are
the attitude of doubting knowledge claims set forth in various areas; justification is inadequate.
a kind of knowledge or justification that depends on evidence, or warrant, from sensory experience.
Where the premises do not offer rational support to make the conclusion believable
a comparison of two otherwise unlike things based on resemblance of a particular aspect